Zylax

Two systems holding different versions of the same customer is an operating cost, not a technical footnote. Zylax builds the integrations that keep records aligned across your platforms, along with the monitoring that tells you the moment they stop agreeing.
API Integration & Data Sync

What we deliver

Ideal for: Teams re-entering the same order, invoice or contact into a second system, or comparing two exports by hand every week.

Why teams choose Zylax

Integrations are judged on the bad days. Ours are designed around what happens when an endpoint times out, a payload changes shape or the same record arrives twice.

Contracts Before Code

Field mappings, mandatory values and rejection rules are documented and agreed, so nobody argues about expected behaviour later.

Safe To Replay

Every write is keyed, so a retry cannot produce a duplicate order, payment or contact record.

Failures Stay Visible

Errors raise an alert carrying the payload, the reason and the affected record, instead of settling into a log nobody opens.

Reconciliation Included

Scheduled comparison reports confirm both systems still agree on counts and totals, and list the rows that do not.

How we work

From first conversation to long after launch.

We turn an unclear requirement into a practical plan — clarifying users, workflows, data, integrations and success criteria before development begins.

01

Discover & define

We agree what success looks like before writing any code.

02

Design & build

Delivered in reviewable stages, tested as we go.

03

Launch & improve

A controlled release, then we stay accountable.

Scope & next step

Integration effort follows the number of endpoints, the state of the source data and how quickly records must move, so we scope before quoting anything. Tell us which two systems disagree and how often, and we will map the work.

Popular questions

Points we work through with technical and operations owners before an integration is signed off. Raise anything further with our team.

Zylax team collaborating on a client software project
Should we sync in real time or on a schedule?
Whichever the process actually needs. Stock levels and payments usually justify event-driven updates, while reporting extracts are often better as an overnight batch that costs less to run and is easier to audit.
Each write carries a key derived from the source record, so a repeated delivery updates the existing entry instead of creating a second one.
Failures raise an alert to email or your chat tool within minutes, quoting the record reference and the error. A daily summary lists anything still outstanding.
Frequently yes, through scheduled file exchange, direct database access or a supported export format. We confirm what the vendor allows before committing to an approach.
Yes. Historical records are cleaned, mapped and loaded as a separate exercise, with row counts and totals checked and signed off before the ongoing sync is switched on.

Do you need any help?

[email protected]

+6012-5109716

Chat with us on WhatsApp
Need help? Ask our assistant